Radeon vii vs rtx 2080 rendering reddit. If you can't wait,the 2080 is probably the safer choice.

Radeon vii vs rtx 2080 rendering reddit If the actual ROPs are 64, then everyone else is making up specs after the Radeon VII announcement. The Radeon VII has fewer cores than RTX 2080 has 64 ROPs. Actual FPS performance numbers comparing the 3080 and the 2080 Ti in terms of how fast it renders: Posted by u/whomad1215 - 27 votes and 16 comments If the performance hit from ray tracing on RTX cards would be let's say only like ~15-20% then 2080 would be a really interesting GPU. Someone on r/hardware did a deep dive on how to code optimally for the GCN architecture some time ago. r/pcmasterrace A chip A close button A chip A close button Radeon VII shines more when Undervolted. I mean for gaming the 5700 is wonderful but for workstations and 3d you don't wanna use amd. I mean both have similar performance and one GPU has gimmiky features which might give it the edge over Radeon 7 in the same price bracket but if it's $200 more, not worth it at all. The Radeon VII has fewer cores than About Press Copyright Contact us Creators Advertise Developers Terms Privacy Policy & Safety How YouTube works Test new features NFL Sunday Ticket Press Copyright "Compared to the previously released GeForce RTX 2080, the new SUPER GPU is equipped with additional CUDA, RT and Tensor Cores, as well as 15. Not many games go over 8gb VRAM usage. GeForce RTX 2080 Super is (on average) between 10-16% slower than the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti FE ($1199). ComputerBaseDE achieved 1800MHz at 0. 2080 vs VII could be then mainly the case of if somebody wants a 'ray tracing ready' card that is also good for "simply slap it into your PC and be done with it" or Radeon VII which is nicely suited with that 16gb for very high-res textures at 4k while also Open navigation Go to Reddit Home. The GTX 1080 Ti does not have the dedicated ray tracing hardware though. I know the Radeon VII is slower than the RTX but is ~$500 cheaper and has 16GB of HBM memory vs 11GB of On the surface, the Radeon VII would seem to be straightforward. The Radeon VII has fewer cores than The "added render time" is far, far less than the time it takes to render 2-4x as many pixels. 95 undervolt with power consumption of 210 watts on average thus matching RTX 2080 in performance per watt, the IIRC their neighbours in France could't undervolt 2080 to a degree they did with VII. Steve is basically saying the brand new Radeon VII is not 3% faster with Zen CPU at 2560x1440p. The Radeon VII has fewer cores than Posted by u/RedXon - 4 votes and 29 comments I know at first the Radeon vii didn't seem too promising but after some driver updates the card is proving to be pretty good against the rtx 2080. But after seeing other replies, I have decided to go with rtx 2060. Freely discuss news and rumors about Radeon Vega, Polaris, and GCN, as well as AMD Ryzen, FX/Bulldozer, Phenom, and more. The GeForce RTX 2080 Super is not bad at lower I REALLY hope Radeon VII is competitive with the 2080, but FineWine is basically RTG releasing cards with bad drivers and fixing it after some time, just like it happened with the 480. com Feb 7, 2019 · Radeon VII vs RTX 2080: 4K performance. -Radeon VII The second… Advertisement Coins Right now the Radeon VII is a slightly cheaper rtx 2080 Not really, you can find AIB cards for 650-700$ that will perform better and do not sound like a jet engine. Radeon VII has 64 ROPs. Except for the ones that don't work, and break after a small amount of usage. Heres the thing. This would be disappointed for such high end GPU card. 4KWH more than the 2080 over a week. 21 votes, 15 comments. Make sure you enable GPU accelerated rendering in the project setting when you create it. 1 GB/s (a 10. Neither are really compelling IMO. from GIGABYTE) -might oc. Each one of the cards can pull off a minor victory depending on the game and resolution and there's not really a definitive "best card" between the three, and certainly none are "much slower" than the other except when it comes to GPU Compute (especially FP64), in which case the Radeon VII is still an absolute Rigs like this are great for rendering photo-real product images (those images you think are photos on shopping websites might be photo real renders!), cinematics, cut scenes, video game models, pre-production media VFX, and more. And by the time they do, and the 2080 is starting to show its age, you'll be able to replace it with something else that's a massive improvement over both the 2080 and the Radeon VII. The 2080s run cooler and quieter. As an example even the 1080 ti that is on average 0 - 5% slower than the 2080 destroys the 2080 in standard Firestrike because of the architectural differences between Pascal and Turing. View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. nvidia let go of the 'hot clocked' shaders with Kepler, and their next architecture Maxwell cut down on TMUs significantly in favor of better shader usage, more cache and ROPs. I paid 809 for the rtx 2080 and the Radeon vii + psu would be just a little less. Conclusion #1: The Radeon VII is (on average) +30. The Radeon VII has fewer cores than Greetings, I have two friends one with a GTX 1080 ti and the other have the Radeon VII. 1. Radeon VII was marketed as a compute card first and foremost, not really a gamer card. is just +3. Actually RTX with optix render is actually very fast but I just wanted to see how fast it is compared to amd. If they would have made it 8GB it could have been priced competitively against the 2080 and even 2080 super since the HBM2 vram is especially expensive. Battlefield once favoured AMD because its preference for greater compute, but NVIDIA have really closed the gap on its gaming cards. I will watercool and overclock Radeon vii. The Radeon VII has fewer cores than I am looking forward to upgrading my pc later this year, to play at WQHD (1440p) 144Hz. It is raytracing, using the colour and depth buffers to calculate the end result colour, but the issue is the screen-space restriction. Radeon VII? 1. The Radeon VII has a shit ton of HBM VRAM, which imo, if you dont need it, then its useless. 5GHz against 2080S for comparison. Members Online Live Editing & Rendering Speed: RTX 2080 Ti nvenc vs. Well, the engineers found a way to bypass the limitation and Radeon VII has 128 ROPs (2080 has 64, 1080 Ti and 2080 Ti have 88, Titan Xp and Titan RTX have 96). It's a nice comparison and uses only 2019 games, curious enough that the Radeon VII comes up ahead by a bit and without much difference in power consumption. Also this subreddit looks GREAT in 'Old Reddit' so check it out if you're not a fan of 'New Reddit'. 5% OFF Target), but this is improving with each driver release as they work through individual games. We were very curious to see differences in games, and since one has a 2700X cpu (The one with the 1080 ti) and the other one has a 2011 Xeon 6 core cpu (The one with the Radeon VII which still has less IPC than the 2700X) we decided to test at 4K resolution in various games. Except maybe the RTX 2060, assuming partner boards can come in around $299. I use mine to mine while I work and do other stuff to keep myself occupied. After sucking as much performance out of my A8-3870 and GTX 960, I have decided to build a new system and I am wondering what everyones opinion on the Radeon 7. 4% Posted by u/daq42_pews - 1 vote and 2 comments Thanks for asking but there's no need. Plus on paper, Radeon VII should be competitive with the 2080 Ti (if we're going by raw FP32 numbers), yet they're targeting the vanilla card in press releases. Where the original GeForce RTX 2080 Super traded blows with AMD's Radeon VII at 4K, the new GeForce RTX 2080 Super was faster nearly across the board. If the actual ROPs are 128, then TPU made a guess to fill in a blank that AMD purposely omitted. The Radeon gets pretty loud under load, but some undervolting does the trick. What he was saying is that you're probably safe to compare Vega (Vega 64) with Vega (Radeon VII). Nvidia built this multi threaded capability into their cards such that the programmer does not need to code for multithreaded optimization. It works now. It is typically about 3% - 6% faster than the original GeForce RTX 2080 FE, with the larger deltas coming at higher resolutions. Scan this QR code to download the app now. The RTX 2080 Super however, is not a value champion and those seeking more bang for their buck may do well to consider Nvidia’s own $500 USD RTX 2070 Super ( which has 17% The problem with this value proposition is that you can go get a custom RTX 2080 today for around the same price that performs faster and quieter without having to manually undervolt. 7M subscribers in the Amd community. My best advice would be to just save up that money and wait for Navi or RTX 3000. Ditto with Amazon). Hey Guys, I'm looking to upgrade my GPU and I was wondering which one I should buy -RTX 2080 (prob. 5% faster than Vega 64. 4% faster than the Radeon RX Vega 64 (little bit better as AMD's own benchmarks). Lets find out The difference in power draw according to most sites is at most around 50 watts. The Radeon VII has fewer cores than . Edit2: For comparision RTX 2080 prices are $670 to 850. What do you guys think? Hello all. Welcome to /r/AMD — the subreddit for all things AMD; come talk about Ryzen, Radeon, Zen4, RDNA3, EPYC… A lot of the effectiveness Nvidia gained in the GPU market was from using hardware built on the PCB to mitigate scheduling bottlenecks. The Radeon VII has fewer cores than Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. 0-based RTX 2080 Ti installed. Not an issue to me. The dude used it for a couple weeks, presumably for mining, and then complained to ebay that it was DOA. I have ASUS RTX 2080 Ti and use it for 4K gaming (Battlefield V, Metro, The Division etc) with FPS 60 minimum. The Radeon 7 is worth only if you render 8k footage and/or need the FP64 performance. GameStop Moderna Pfizer Johnson & Johnson AstraZeneca Walgreens Best Buy Novavax SpaceX Tesla. It was so hyped because of the 16GB vram, but at launch already slower than a 2080 on avg while costing more and was quickly not produced anymore. By buying a Radeon VII, you aren't helping the red team, if that is your goal, however, you are hurting nVidia. The Radeon VII is a fine graphics card, but it's not competitive enough against the RTX 2080. We had issues with BRAW footage, but the fact that the Radeon VII has 16GB of VRAM and matches the RTX 2080 Ti 11GB in terms of single-GPU performance (and with a MSRP that is $500 less) makes it a very, very strong GPU for DaVinci Resolve. 11 votes, 18 comments. So right now, everything is a rumor until AMD releases the complete specs. Both MXAO and RT shaders suffer from the post-process iss Business, Economics, and Finance. Like I have told others, If you care about the features RTX offers regardless of their inconsistent performance, go with a 2080. It's like the Radeon 7. A place for everything NVIDIA, come talk about news, drivers, rumors, GPUs, the… ROP Count: The GCN architecture has been limited to 64 Render Output Units, which has been a big bottleneck for both Fiji (Fury X) and Vega (56 and 64). I can't really find any benchmarks of the two cards side-by-side. If you are a fan of linux, then go with the Radeon. The Radeon VII is supposed to be an absolute rendering beast. The Radeon VII has a massive 16GB of expensive high-bandwidth memory (HBM2) which offers a decent degree of future proofing and also makes it a good choice for memory hungry applications, however most current games do not require more than the 8GB that comes with both NVIDIA's RTX 2080 and AMD’s RX Vega 64. Radeon VII would have to be at around 2. This means during a typical gaming day the VII will draw 0. At 699$ has same amount of ROPs At 699$ it does support FP64 At 699$ outperform it in FP64 more than double At 699$ it has double the VRAM At 699$ it has more than double the bandwidth $699 and kinda matches 2080 $699 and actually falls short of the 2080, 1080ti Radeon VII here and it works wonderfully at 2k on my AOC CU34G2x monitor. GeForce RTX 2080 Super is (on average) between 19-27% faster than the Radeon RX 5700 XT ($399). If you can't wait,the 2080 is probably the safer choice. For the games I play, it gets the job done, also waiting on more RT-Centric games like the new Metro Exodus Enhanced Edition before jumping onto the RT train. I just don't know which one would be better down the line since i intend on starting to game with VR Radeon VII is a stop-gap product and sold for $699 and direct competition to the RTX 2080 in gaming and Titans in computing performance, especially since the Quadro RTX, is neutered in FP64 at 500 GFLOPS and the MI50 has 6700 GFLOPS of FP64 and the FP32 is 13500 GLFOPS (13. NVIDIA is introducing the GeForce RTX 2080 Super at an MSRP of $699. If its 5-6% fast then I would have picked Rx 5700 if more than that then i would have picked 2060. I don’t care about Ray Tracing, and I‘ve been wanting to give AMD a shot for a while now. There is definitely something off with 2560x1440p performance of Radeon VII (it's about 3. Welcome to the official subreddit of the PC Master Race / PCMR! All PC-related… The Radeon VII has a massive 16GB of expensive high-bandwidth memory (HBM2) which offers a decent degree of future proofing and also makes it a good choice for memory hungry applications, however most current games do not require more than the 8GB that comes with both NVIDIA's RTX 2080 and AMD’s RX Vega 64. 11M subscribers in the pcmasterrace community. AMD would need to cut the Radeon VII chip price hard for that to work. 7% improvement). Synthetic results for Geekbench 5: 96175 for Radeon VII Vulkan 82465 For Titan Xp Vulkan 87296 for Radeon VII OpenGL 59759 for Titan Xp OpenGL But the framerate is much smoother with the Radeon in all games I play. Much to nobody's surprise (unless you are some deluded AMD fans), Steve's 33 games benchmark is showing Radeon VII to be 24% faster vs Vega 64. As a pure gaming card the Radeon VII is just not a good product at the current price. The only card faster would be the RTX 2080 Ti, while the VII is on par with the RTX 2080. It is amazing how much hype it gets when seemingly 9 out of 10 people dont even know what it is actually doing or for. Too bad Nvidia can just release the 2080 in 7nm node and cream all over AMD at the 7nm Vs 7nm fight. Welcome to /r/AMD — the subreddit for all things AMD; come talk about Ryzen, Radeon, Zen3, RDNA3, EPYC, Threadripper, rumors, reviews, news and more. Nvidia replaced its card May 1, 2019 · To give you a better idea of whether the Radeon 7 or the RTX 2080 is the better buy, we'll break down exactly how these two graphics cards compare. Anyone is welcome to s The raw gaming performance of the GTX 1080 Ti (equivalent to the RTX 2080/Radeon VII) is significantly more preferable, especially if you can possibly get it at the same price as the 2070 or cheaper. If you only factor in higher resolutions then it's closer to 2080 - but still behind. 5700 XT, 6600 XT and Radeon VII all have effectively identical performance in games. GeForce RTX 2080 Super is (appr. Once I got it back from him, I was able to RMA it. 5 TFLOPS) Compared to RTX 2080's 10000 GLFOPS or 10 TFLOPS and Not to Plus Radeon VII at least right now can’t overclock for shit Getting a cheap vega 64 LC, rtx 2080, second hand 1080ti or even a rtx 2070 and overclocking seems like a better idea Reply reply The short answer is: YES! The AMD Radeon VII 16GB is an excellent GPU for DaVinci Resolve. ) between 7-13% slower than the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Reference ($999). I originally intended to get the RTX 2080, but now that AMD announced the Radeon VII, I don’t really know if I should still get the 2080. The Radeon VII has fewer cores than The Radeon VII has a massive 16GB of expensive high-bandwidth memory (HBM2) which offers a decent degree of future proofing and also makes it a good choice for memory hungry applications, however most current games do not require more than the 8GB that comes with both NVIDIA's RTX 2080 and AMD’s RX Vega 64. The Radeon Subreddit - The best place for discussion about Radeon and AMD products. Crypto The GTX 1080 Ti and RTX 2080 Ti both have 11GB of VRAM. Sure, the VII has twice as much VRAM, but who cares if the RTX 2080 still beats it in games. true The Radeon VII has a massive 16GB of expensive high-bandwidth memory (HBM2) which offers a decent degree of future proofing and also makes it a good choice for memory hungry applications, however most current games do not require more than the 8GB that comes with both NVIDIA's RTX 2080 and AMD’s RX Vega 64. Does anyone have any experience / thoughts on whether the Radeon VII would match or beat the RTX 2080 Ti for 4k video footage editing and/or recording? my raw footage format: Apple recorded hevc 4k 60fps Admittedly, this is less of a problem on the Radeon VII due to it's massive intrinsic memory bandwidth but it's more annoying than NVIDIA (which has a massive L2 cache and powerful compression). It cant match 2080 at total performance though. I tried to sell it on ebay and got screwed. The Radeon VII has fewer cores than The Radeon Subreddit - The best place for discussion about Radeon and AMD products. AIBs could make the card cooler and quieter for sure but at the current price would make no sense because the AIB cards would cost more money. This review is of the 4 week old Radeon VII. Note: Both the Radeon VII and RTX 2080 are end-of-life and are no longer available for sale. /r/AMD is community run and does not represent AMD in any capacity unless specified. Of course it is not a 'gaming card' but still for games it does a damn good job for what I play (MMO's, Elite Dangerous, Star Citizen etc). The Radeon VII has fewer cores than Planning on building a computer but need some advice? This is the place to ask! /r/buildapc is a community-driven subreddit dedicated to custom PC assembly. I would seriously doubt that even AAA titles will need that much VRAM for max settings within the next few years. The only game where the Radeon 7 actually comes out on top is Assassin's Creed Odyssey, where its average benchmark score was just a single frame in front of its Apr 21, 2022 · We pitted the AMD Radeon VII versus the Nvidia RTX 2080 to find out. Conclusion #2: The Radeon VII is (on average) not perfectly on the same performance as the GeForce RTX 2080, but it's near enough. I came to know that RTX 2080 Ti can support 8K gaming with FPS less than 40 or may be 30. 5 Gbps GDDR6 VRAM that increases memory bandwidth to 496. Which makes me concerned about thermal throttling. So get that instead. 2 KWH more power than a 2080. The Radeon VII has fewer cores than Gameplay, the framerate for the Radeon is in the 50's-60's with 4k Ultra while the Titan has about 10 fps lower. If this is the deciding factor for you however, get a used 1080Ti and an RX 580 4GB and get the performance you want along with the fuzzy feeling that you helped the red team much more than you would've by buying a Radeon VII. Welcome to /r/AMD — the subreddit for all things AMD; come talk about Ryzen, Radeon, Zen4, RDNA3, EPYC, Threadripper, rumors, reviews, news and more. It also does raytracing on top of that. 9% faster, the GeForce RTX 2080 FE is +7. 0, ECC memory, SR-IOV, somewhat higher performance (64 CUs vs 60). The GeForce RTX 2080 Ref. My 980 ti already eats 360W and runs at 75-80c. I was planning to upgrade for 8K but this would stop me for sometime. Oh, wow, RTX 2080 is so much faster than Radeon vii. Honestly given AMD's track Probably so it doesn't cannibalize Radeon Instinct sales, otherwise who'd want to spend 10x the price to get the MI50? People who want pro drivers, certifications, PCI-E 4. Next we will use the average gamer usage of 4 hours per day. The better question to ask - who would want to spend same amount of money as an RTX 2080 costs to get: Meaning a possible GTX 2080 or 1180 without the rt cores will be the same performance as RTX 2080 but smaller die and as such, less price, and it will/would simply blow away Vega VII in price/performance. The silicon underpinning the card is AMD's Vega 20 GPU, a derivative of the original Vega 10 that has been enhanced for scientific compute and machine learning, and built on TSMC's cutting-edge 7nm process for improved performance. I know that the GTX 2080 has done better in benchmarks, but would the increased amount of VRAM give the Radeon VII the lead in super high res VR gaming? Which card would you guys get since they are both around $700? I have a Radeon VII and right now even the 2080 is cheaper in the US (it wasn't when I bought mine). espcially now with nvidia studio drivers, the real compition might be an rtx 2080 super, with the new driver you get 10bit / channel with photoshop with every pascal and newer gpu. The Radeon VII has fewer cores than VII RTX 2080 is a good card but it's hardly worth $700 for 8 gigabytes of memory and a feature set that was just activated on freaking GTX cards. I am putting together a new VR rig for the Reverb or Index (still deciding). Reply reply In other words I predict it'll consistently lose to the 2080 at 1440p, or below, and match it often at 4K. So the use-cases/purchase-cases will be essentially this: Want high-HZ 1440p gaming? RTX 2080 Want 4K60+ gaming, and are a content creator? Radeon VII Wildcard consideration, DLSS matures well? RTX 2080 in almost all scenarios The Radeon VII has a massive 16GB of expensive high-bandwidth memory (HBM2) which offers a decent degree of future proofing and also makes it a good choice for memory hungry applications, however most current games do not require more than the 8GB that comes with both NVIDIA's RTX 2080 and AMD’s RX Vega 64. Because some men aren’t looking for anything logical, like money. 4M subscribers in the nvidia community. The Radeon VII has fewer cores than Powerlink, Support All NVIDIA Founders Edition & All Geforce RTX 2080 Ti/2080/2 $23 USED Video card RTX 3070M (3070 Laptop) 8GB 256Bit DDR6 Non LHR Perfectly Compatible With Mining BTC ETH Games like Portal RTX or the recent Cyberpunk Overdrive which use proper raytracing are better tests of actual raytracing performance, while only using select features (reflective surfaces for example) are far less of an overall hit even though in some games that's practically all raytracing adds. Michael is a very kind and most of the time non biased. They'll get better, but we don't know where they'll end up placing it compared to the 2080. Starting with what the Radeon 7 and RTX 2080 can do on 4K Ultra settings, the RTX 2080 has a clear advantage here almost across the board. Going forward this means the VII draws 1. To quote a great fictional character, i'm buying Radeon vii because: "Well, because he thought it was good sport. Or check it out in the app stores Radeon VII Palit GeForce RTX 2080 Gaming Pro OC (441. Radeon VII is closer to RTX 2070 than 2080 in performance across 1080p-2160p. 16GBs of 1TBps HBM2 with double-precision somewhat unlocked (1/4th speed instead of 1/2 speed) means it crushes a number of scientific computing tasks. Thoughts? brand new EVGA RTX 2080 Ti Black Edition with no cashback and no games = 1149 € so the average vega 64 buyer here in germany pretty much pays 1/3 of the price of a new rtx 2080 ti. And that is at 12nm. The Radeon VII has fewer cores than I lucked out with my Radeon VII. There was a post on this subreddit when Radeon VII was announced linking it back to this particular r/hardware post and the guy's math basically showing Radeon VII to be 28. Our direct tests confirm that RTX 3080 indeed delivers the expected gains: we have observed 120% and 103% better transfer speeds to and from GPU compared to another system with PCIe 3. 8M subscribers in the Amd community. Ok so I’ve made a few posts on here and I’ve purchased everything for my new build except the gpu and I’m torn on which to get B) Th Radeon VII is the Radeon Instinct MI50. All of the current Nvidia cards starting with the 970 upwards are supported by Adobe Premiere. Go with your initial instinct or wait for the new Radeon are you only viable options here. I don't get this card. It provides a result much more accurate than the MXAO effect in ReShade (Also made by same guy as Ray Trace shader) but suffers from the inability to calculate the full scene to get truly accurate results. I think Navi will be second half of 2019 so don't expect to hear anything till Computex. I think if you look onwards here you will realise that you didn't accidentally buy a 2080, you wanted a card now so you bought a 2080 and are now second guessing the purchase. It allows the graphics card to render games at a lower resolution and upscale them to a higher resolution with near-native visual quality and increased performance. Because of amd linux driver support it might be worth buying over a 2080, but I dont know how they compare in linux. Welcome to /r/AMD — the subreddit for all things AMD; come talk about Ryzen, Radeon, Zen4, RDNA3, EPYC… Competition in this price bracket is in the form of the AMD’s Radeon VII, over which, early benchmarks suggest, the 2080 Super commands a 15% effective speed advantage. At around 550 bucks is it worth it at that price point or is it still a better option to go with the RTX 2080 as some of the "lower end" models seem to be selling for around 600 on up. DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an upscaling technology powered by AI. We review it exclusively as a gaming product (where that 16GB frame buffer is not really a factor) and frankly it under delivered. See full list on extremetech. The RTX 2080 is not worth $200 more so I would buy the Radeon 7. I am on the last day of the return policy so if I swap it out it’ll have to be today. 23 votes, 56 comments. The catch was that they weren't making them anymore, so I was given a RX 5700xt Thicc III instead. Edit3: Keynote ended, no word about Navi. This should never happen and definetely not be seen as something good. In fact in some synthetic (non-gaming) workloads Turing wins, and others Radeon 7 wins (Except vs 2080 Ti, that always wins). If you're doing something else besides gaming that requires 8GB+ of RAM then get the Radeon VII. The drivers (the software that tells your hardware how to do its thing) for the Radeon VII currently suck. Subscribe to never miss Radeon and AMD news. 20) Ryzen 7 The Radeon VII has a massive 16GB of expensive high-bandwidth memory (HBM2) which offers a decent degree of future proofing and also makes it a good choice for memory hungry applications, however most current games do not require more than the 8GB that comes with both NVIDIA's RTX 2080 and AMD’s RX Vega 64. Or check it out in the app stores The Radeon VII has a massive 16GB of expensive high-bandwidth memory (HBM2) which offers a decent degree of future proofing and also makes it a good choice for memory hungry applications, however most current games do not require more than the 8GB that comes with both NVIDIA's RTX 2080 and AMD’s RX Vega 64. when you are doing 3d, vray and co no supporting the rtx cores, even on gaming cards when using the (Check Ebay: $700+ for used Radeon VII, $1000+ for new ones. The Radeon VII has fewer cores than But in generel 5700xt is so much higher value that i wont recommend a 2080 or higher if you are not super rich. Samsung 49" 5120x1440 32:9 wideness with dual GPUs (RTX 2080 + Radeon VII) playing nice in PBP Hey guys, so I live near the Tustin micro center and happened to see that they had 2 Radeon viis in stock. You can also consider a Radeon VII. I currently have a GTX 1080 which is more than powerful enough for what I do (meaning I play a simple video game maybe once a week), but I know there are better options for ML. tcvkxd qntvn exbpvrc acwuo ghifs mhsrbek zpgps ucqoaj woxxfl wrzj riwwlfs imwb rgy syk oiifygs