Awaiting reviewer assignment for a long time. I have submitted the paper on 31st January 2021.

Awaiting reviewer assignment for a long time 15-6. The status of my submission changed from "Under Review" to "Ready for Decision" on November 8 and it has been constant since then. 15. I have written to (name) on (date) and (date), but have not heard back from him/her. At this point, reviewers should also be sent an email or letter letting them know the outcome of their review. This change has occurred 2. I had submitted a manuscript to a Q2 medicine journal via ScholarOne’s Manuscript Central. 5 months is quite a long time. Should I be worried? Is there anything I can do to accelerate this process? The problem is, I am planning to submit an adapted version of the manuscript as a book chapter. I submited my paper to The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. Scenario 1: with editor/under editor evaluation >> awaiting reviewer selection >> under review If this is how the status had changed the first time you submitted the paper, then chances are that your paper is actually being sent for a re-review. The EiC at that time said they'll look This status typically means your manuscript is awaiting assignment to an editor after the initial review of the submission. I suppose that in most cases of minor revision, the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or associate editor. The status is "Waiting for reviewer assignment" since 24-4-2017. a year is a very long time, For another submission, it is over 2 months now, and it is still 'Awaiting Reviewer Assignment'. Also, you can do it sooner next time, after a month or so; 2. Therefore, waiting for an answer longer than expected is not very extreme. So Manuscript status changing from Awaiting Reviewer Invitation to Awaiting Reviewer Assignment ? Question. What the Hell?! What does it mean if after 6 I submitted a manuscript to a journal in December of 2021. Take time to reflect Put the comments to one side for a few days, then come back to them. If there is no update by then, you may consider writing to the editor about it. the status of “awaiting reviewer assignment” just last for less than one day, and on the same day, the status was changed to “awaiting reviewer scores”. The status of my submission is still "awaiting assignment". Nisar Ahmed, it is very frustrating for a researcher to wait for such long time. If this makes sense, 1. I have contacted the editor in chief (EiC) a few times regarding this. The review process is fast, hoping for a good result. Hope for the best! Register and Select New Reviewer: Begins the process of registering a new reviewer; you must have the person's email address, name, and country to complete the process. The paper status is still "awaiting reviewer assignment". Sorry! nothing found for. But until now, 5/17, the status are still "awaiting decision". I submitted manuscript in October, 2021. For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting . I want to know if it is normal to wait a long time in order to change of status. For How long should I wait for a response from the I downvoted this answer because by far the most time consuming step is the peer review itself, and "awaiting AE assignment" is a sign that review has not started yet. "Awaiting reviewer invitation" should strictly be a very brief status, since the time between the editor deciding to invite reviewers and the editor actually inviting reviewers should be very brief, on the order of a few minutes. A review invitation has been sent out but the reviewer has not yet accepted it. Share. The status of the paper changed several times. However, we have not received a confirmation that the manuscript was received. As the Editor has Answer: The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. Reviews can be returned to the editor within a few days, or it may take a couple of weeks depending on the journal. It often means we asked 6 people, 3 agreed, 2 said no, and 1 never responded to the request. I have no idea why this is the case, but it meant that some papers stay on 'Reviews Completed' for a long time as we are securing and waiting for a third review report before making a decision. During the process, a considerable amount of time might be needed. I am really confused, can I contact the journal to explain this or should I just wait? I wrote an email to the editor asking if everything is ok and if I can be of further assistance, and they then sent it for review immediately after. Reviewer assignments (i. After two and half months the status got changed from awaiting reviewer scores to awaiting recommendation. If an editor finds that your work is better suited for another AGU journal, your decision letter will include a link to transfer your submission files to the new journal for consideration. Is this normal? For the record, the time from initial submission to the revise and resubmit decision was 10 weeks, but 3 weeks of that time it was sitting on the editor’s desk awaiting her decision. Can I send a email to AE? Sometimes, a reviewer may pull out after being assigned, for reasons of a lack of time, mismatch (with their subject area), or conflict of interest. (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again . Or (in one system I know of), Awaiting Reviewer Selection. ' It has been a month now, but the status has not changed. Stage 1: Initial quality check This stage includes checks on authorship, competing interests, ethics approval and plagiarism. " I don't think you should worry because this does not look like a case of desk rejection. May I know is there any chances for at least to get a major revision. Now, it's in the "Awaiting EIC Decision" for more than one month. Awaiting allocation: The paper has been assigned to the Editor but "Awaiting reviewers reply" means that your manuscript has been sent out for review. All the best for your submission! Answered by Editage Insights on 21 Dec, 2021 . What can I do if my submission remains 'Awaiting Reviewer Assignment' for a long time? Hope this helps. Improve this answer. Finally, the status now is awaiting final decision since a week. Awaiting Reviewer Scores So, waiting for a long time to hear from the Editor after reviews have My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. I sent two emails about updating the status of the paper to editor and Editor-in-Chief several days ago and I got no reply from them. Then, the other reviewers submitted their reviews and the Editor decided to go with these reviews only. Finding reviewers usually takes some time as reviewers are busy researchers This caused the system to stuck in "Awaiting reviewer Assignment". You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. This is the way to Editor here. In the month of December, I got a "reject and resubmit" decision. 3 answers. (The journal I submitted to What does it mean for SAGE SSCI awaiting reviewer assignment after I submitted my revised verision? I want to know if it is normal to wait a long time in order to change of status. A few days ago, the status changed from 'Awaiting reviewer response' to 'Awaiting reviewer scores. Awaiting Editor Assignment: Your article has passed initial quality checks by the Editorial Production Assistant and is in the process of being assigned to an appropriate Editor who will evaluate your article for scope, quality, and fit for the journal. " I think my manuscript entered a time loop. 14, awaiting reviewer selection. That does not necessarily mean your paper is actually waiting on reviewers to be chosen. After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was "Awaiting AE recommendation. When the status changes to "Under Review", the manuscript is with reviewers Note that the review process at Some editors keep a paper for long time, more than 6 months or a year, without a decision and when send them a reminder message they do not reply or sometimes reply for the first time saying that It depends on the reviewer and the journal. A long decision time can be either 1) the AE is lazy or 2) both reports are positive and the AE is scrutizing your paper to find if it is possible to reject it 4 years ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Giod ! I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (major revision). :-) Coming to your query, what ‘Editorial assignment pending’ at this stage means is that your revised manuscript is awaiting a review by an associate editor (AE). Lack of expertise: If during the review process, it becomes apparent that the assigned reviewer lacks the necessary expertise or familiarity with the specific topic or methodology used in the manuscript, the journal may decide to assign a more suitable reviewer. If ‘Awaiting EIC Decision’ is taking too long, is that a good sign or a bad sign? After almost three weeks of being in Awaiting Reviewer Assignment, the status has changed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. ” This probably means that the peer reviewers have declined the invitations, However, if it has not gone through peer review, but is directly showing the status “awaiting final decision,” then there is a possibility that your paper might be rejected after initial screening by the editor. On 4/26, the status on ScholarOne changed to awaiting decision. Hi, I have submitted my manuscript to an Elsevier journal. Manuscript status changing from Awaiting Reviewer Invitation to Awaiting Reviewer Assignment ? Question. So, one can’t really put a timeline to it. Promote Your Paper For technical support during this time, The ‘7’ indicates that the ‘Reviewer Scores are 1 week late’ e-mail should send when the due date is 7 days passed but the task has not been completed. UgkR4R‡ ÀÕ=$¢²×ÃN °9iõ¨Z$d^°úãן þûO Á¸û ´lÇåöx}~_¾ÍúïäçËÑ« {ñ¹ Œg^BÈÍ È1¤R²Ý6 Yr$ ›0üo~³ÿ “ÑŽéÆU »J’ý Some editors keep a paper for long time, more than 6 months or a year, without a decision and when send them a reminder message they do not reply or sometimes reply for the first time saying that After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. The peer-review system is widely regarded as the primary means of ensuring the quality of scientific publications [] and has the potential to enhance the rigour of research in the academic community []. How can I check the status of my submitted paper? Modified on Fri, 27 Oct 2023 at 04:59 PM. Do not email to ask about After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. After submitting the revision it goes through (awaiting for reviewer selection -> awaiting for reviewer scores -> awaiting for editors decision -> Awaiting EIC Decision). Thank you for your time. (Awaiting decision), after 2 days, the status is changed again (Awaiting Reviewer Scores). To check the status of your submission in o I submitted a research paper to a journal. I submit my manuscript to IEEE WCL on 4/14/2019 (Minor revision). My paper submissions (all to the Astrophysical Journal) have all been followed up by the editor within a week of initial submission. " (as the associate Initially your manuscript will go through stages such as “Awaiting Admin Checklist” and/or “Awaiting Editor Assignment” depending on how new submissions are initially checked After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Can you tell me what sort of time frame to keep in mind as I am awaiting news of my submission? I submitted a paper to some journal. It is also possible that the handling editor did find suitable reviewers, but they were not available to review your paper at the time. At least two of the common review systems show "awaiting reviewer selection" if there is ANY reviewer invitation outstanding. The reviewer has accepted the invitation and the editor is waiting to receive reviewer comments. The main statuses indicated are: New submission: The paper has been submitted successfully by the author and is waiting to be checked by the Managing Editor before being forwarded to the Editor. ” Final thoughts. Sincerely, [Your name]. , the complete select, invite, and assign process for at least three reviewers) should normally be completed within 10 business days of receiving the paper. However they The first status was (awaiting degree reports) and suddenly changed after 34 days to (decision awaiting) and now change to again ( awaiting referee reports) Kindly give info Cite 2 Recommendations I have submitted my paper to an IET journal. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. 9, awaiting reviewer assignment. This change has occurred What the "awaiting reviewer scores" most plausibly means here is that the reviews are now due! 4 weeks is also the time I'd expect the AE to allot for the reviewers (from past experience), and so the timing is right for the status to change from "Under review" to "Awaiting reviewer scores" - so it just means some reviewers haven't yet submitted it and the reviews are either due or overdue. Skip to My manuscript suddenly went from "Awaiting Final Decision" back to "Awaiting Reviewer I submitted a paper, and it took 10 days to be assigned editors and reviewers. the second one was 'awaiting eic assignment' and now it says 'awaiting ae assignment'. But only after two days under review the status changed to “Awaiting AE Recommendation”. After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’. The acceptance for IEEE Signal Processing Letters did not take much time for me. " Should I expect a After 20 days, status has changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment" and after 4 days, it has changed to "awaiting reviewer scores". Resources for authors and journals Upvote this Answer; Comment. ” How long do I have to submit my revision? X. It was perhaps a minor revision or not a very extensive major revision. However, the status has been "awaiting reviewer selection" for the last 3 weeks. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Within a couple of days the status changed to "assigning for review". " Does this Aug 25, 2020 · Hi. I would recommend asking respectfully, showing that you understand they are busy. If that is the case, EDIT: Well now it jumped back to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. It’s only when the status changes to ‘Under Review,’ as you have rightly The difference between "reviewer invited" and "under review" is simply that in the second case, at least one invited reviewer has agreed to review it. Here are some suggestions for additional potential colleagues who would be in a position to provide suitable peer review. However, sometimes, the AE is not satisfied with the reviews and feels the need for an additional review. Especially after the reviewers have finished, it takes a bit long in the hands of TE and SE, totaling 2 The status will change to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" then probably go through a couple more cycles of "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again My paper was submitted to a ScholarOne journal and the submission status changed in the following way: "Awaiting review assignment" for 2 weeks, "Awaiting AE recommendation" for 1 week, and now it is "Awaiting SE decision. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. 20220810 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment - Waiting for reviewer The first time I submitted, I waited for three months, and it was continuously under review. The first time I contacted was when a whole year was passed without even a single response. The status "Awaiting AE assignment" implies that an editor will be assigned to handle the correspondence of After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 3. This is a long period, what are your recommendations? NB: Follow up email sent twice in the previous week BUT, if we decided the paper needed a third reviewer (e. In theory, the The drawback is that the speed is a bit slow. Needless to say, I won't be submitting to SF any time soon, 6 years ago # QUOTE 4 GOOD 2 NO GOOD! Reply. My last status was ''awaiting AE recommendation," and now it has changed to ''awaiting ED decision'' does this means my paper is rejected or what? Note that the time it takes for an editor to make a decision on your revision may vary depending on the editor's workload and the time of year. 2. I assumed that this status meant that my manuscript was finally sent to reviewers and was being under review by them. Then I submitted the revised manuscript in 10 days. " On July 12 the status was Awaiting AE Assignment Awaiting EIC Decision Does it mean How long should I wait for a response from The statuses on submission portals change based on the journal's processes in real-time. – I submitted my revised manuscript to a mathematical journal since 12-04-2017. 6. The status changed to awaiting reviewer selection, and then changed to awaiting reviewer scores. In this case 15 days is plenty of time to ask for a status update. @Coder: When it comes to IEEE or Elsevier, 15 days is not a long time at all (unless you are communicating with journals that come under Letters). Is long period a good or bad sign? I do understand that you cannot have exact answer. I thought it may take 3 months or so for reviews to come in, but I am starting to get worried that it may potentially take longer than this. g. After that communication with the editor, neither the editor nor the handling editor return Anybody know how long it should take a journal to assign reviewers to an article? I have had a piece under review for over 2 months, and the online status is still "awaiting reviewer assignment," even though authors are encouraged to suggest the potential reviewers (which I That way, less reviewer time is wasted, and it would have a general downward effect on the number of publications that those grad students and post-docs could amass. If the paper was sent back for revision, the Manuscript status changing from Awaiting Reviewer Invitation to Awaiting Reviewer Assignment ? Question. Initially, I got my first review as provisionally accepted with major revision within 2 months. View. Awaiting Editor Assignment: Multiple editors may be assigned to your submission, Sometimes, the tracking system may show the “Reviewer Invited” status for some time and then move back to “With Editor. • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where an agreed reviewer did not return their review in the allocated time • Make Recommendation: Manuscripts where all reviews have been received and the AE can make 2. I want to know if it is normal to wait a long time in order to change of It might take a long time to find appropriate reviewers. Within less than two months it came for minor revision. Awaiting Editor Assignment: Your article has passed initial quality checks by the Editorial Production Assistant and is in the process of being assigned to an appropriate Editor who will evaluate your article for scope, quality, and fit for Since the reviews have come in, the AE should ideally not take too long to give his recommendation. As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. This change has occurred Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 I just thought after all reviewer scores, I will disagree. So, after 6 months, I asked them after 6 months about the status of the paper. Now it is almost 3 weeks. What does it mean? Have the reviewers started working on my manuscript yet? Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) The initial selection of referees is usually comprised in the previous step. Your reviewers will read your paper or case study and teaching note and provide the journal editor with detailed and useful comments. Awaiting ME I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. . My paper has been submitted for more than 15 months in one of the IEEE transactions. The current status of the manuscript is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and has not changed for a month now. Finally, the editor in Chief As a matter of fact, I thought it’s being processed as the email has been marked as read, but I did not hear from the journal for a long time. Although in my earlier submission of other papers in the same journal, in this time frame, my paper went into review process. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Our SAP Certified Associate C_TS4CO_2021 practice exam questions are available at any time, anywhere, at your convenience, I submitted my manuscript five weeks ago, and in a week, the status appeared as 'Awaiting Reviewer Selection. selecting. Can you please guide what obstacles I have crossed and what is If the status of the manuscript is shown as "With Editor", the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. 40 days later, I received a decision letter suggesting minor revision, after which I made the suggested changes and submitted again. After that, it took three weeks for ‘Awaiting reviewer scores. The journal review process. Dear Dr. Since then, the article has been jumping between "Waiting for Reviewer Assignment" and "Contacting Potential Reviewers" (10 I downvoted this answer because by far the most time consuming step is the peer review itself, and "awaiting AE assignment" is a sign that review has not started yet. I want to know how long will this status last. Popular Articles. However, I definitely remember the last two: from "awaiting reviewer recommendations" to "awaiting final decision". I have heard from my peers and other co-researchers and investigators, that the EIC decision should not be taking so long. I have submitted a paper in a journal's special issue. Can anybody please tell me what does it indicate? My paper underwent a revision. I can't find the exact average time but for most papers, it took two to three months between submitted, revised, and accepted status. ” Should I inquire about the review status? Does it mean your paper will go through another round of review? Not necessarily. This change has occurred As can be inferred from Fig. I received provisional acceptance with minor revisions. I'm an Assistant Professor and I get far more review requests than I could ever handle, at the same time that my institutional service responsibilities are ramping up (fewer T-T profs around my Waiting time. 2, the assignment result of reviewers to papers determines the expertise of the reviewer who will review the paper, hence it is the crucial step in the whole peer review process. Now for the last 2 weeks, it's showing awaiting EIC. If all the reviewers accept the invitations, the peer review process will start and the status will change to "Under review. Awaiting Reviewer Selection After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. ’ But this could be because the associate editor (AE) may have had a challenge finding reviewers for your manuscript. That is absolutely ridiculous to charge that much and take that long to send it out. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it I submitted an article 5 months ago to a journal. If it is possible to see more details that would be good but knowing the average For more experienced authors, if you’re a reluctant reviewer who doesn’t respond in time, and may not submit review reports on time, you may not expect that others will do otherwise for you. After three months I contacted the editor and s/he informed me that the review is still going on. Awaiting AE Recommendation to Awaiting AE Assignment. In such cases, the journal will assign a different reviewer. Now this is the fourth month and the status is still the same. I would like to inquire about the status of our submitted manuscript since it has now been [insert the amount of time that has passed]. Quoting this answer, Depending on the scope of submitted paper, editors sometimes have hard time to find a suitable reviewer. The status changed to "Assigned to AE" 2 days after submission. 5 months with no change in status. 21, awaiting AE decision. However, I just noticed that the status of my manuscript at any time on the online peer review system. It depends on whether the editor invites new reviewers. If a reviewer who agreed to volunteer their time is no longer available or responsive, please feel free to reach out to a new reviewer. 2023. By November it showed awaiting EIC decision. Article awaiting reviewer invitation 6 months after submission. 6. I have not had any news about it since. During the peer-review process, submitted articles are assessed by a panel of experts, known as reviewers, who evaluate the competence, importance and I want to know if it is normal to wait a long time in order to change of status. How long I should wait for the final verdict? After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. Some do it in time, some start a day before the deadline, some need a number of reminders after the deadline, After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. How to respond to an editor's post-review comments suggesting major changes I'm not willing I suggest you try to figure out how long the time from submission to accept/reject (turnaround time) is for the particular journal you submitted to. 12, awaiting reviewer selection. What does it could be once or a series of reviewer-author responses. However, I definitely remember the last two: I submitted a short paper to a math journal more that one month ago. Try to recollect how the statuses changed when you submitted the paper the first time. The status "Reviewers contacted" means that the editor has sent out review invitations to the requisite number of reviewers (usually 2 or 3). It has been 1. Four weeks is a long time for an Editor to sit on a decision. We oversee this process to e I submitted a manuscript to a journal by SAGE. due to a split decision on the initial reviews), it NEVER changed back to 'Under Review'. · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Article is undergoing the peer review, and is waiting for the acceptance of its evaluator(s) · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Article is undergoing the peer review, and one or both of the evaluators has accepted the invitation and/or at least one evaluation has been completed Generally, the status changes to "Awaiting ED recommendations" once peer review for the paper is done and the reviewer comments have come in. 0 of 0. Post I want to know if it is normal to wait a long time in order to change of status. but only invite a few at a time. ’ Now, it is almost a month since the status changed to ‘Awaiting EIC Decision. A month is a long time to go with no word. Some editors keep a paper for a long time, more than 6 months or a year, without a decision. In this Awaiting review invitation means "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: Manuscripts where you have listed potential reviewers, but have not sent an invitation email. Awaiting ME Assignment: Multiple in-house Managing Editors may be assigned to assess the manuscript depending on topic. So, why has it returned to If accepted, the paper is sent to production. subject=status report of (paper)? // "I'm concerned about my (date) submission, which was confirmed on (date). So your manuscript is one step closer to a final decision. Why is the status of my manuscript showing "Awaiting Reviewers Assignment" and "Awaiting EiC Decision" at the same time? How long should I wait for a response from the journal? It Appearing after short interval of awaiting reviewer assignment clearly means that associate editors have advised against it! Thank you, William, for your prompt reply. Role of the reviewer. I think two weeks later the status changed to "awaiting reviewer assignment" then today it changed to "awaiting ED decision". Time to decision depends on the journal and the length of your paper. while the editor selects reviewers and the reviewers start and complete their reviews, you may wish to spend some time understanding what happens next. In the first notification, I got a major revision. This would explain the status change from "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" back to "Awaiting Reviewer Selection. As stated by Rodriguez, Bollen, and Van de Sompel (2007): “one of the first and potentially most important stage is the one that attempts to distribute submitted Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. times. The bad sign stems from the fact that it really shouldn't take seven months to find a reviewer. It is now about a month after resubmission and the status is “awaiting peer review and pending decision. A paper submitted on the 28th of Feb has been on 'awaiting reviewer selection' to date. Is it because the AE did not accept the recommendation or my paper has problem? Thank you very much! In October (or November, my bad, I don't remember exactly, I should've taken note) the status changed to 'awaiting reviewer score', and that's what the status says to this day. I was asked to resubmit the paper with modifications within a month. This status indicates that a Managing Editor is being assigned based on that consideration. Monitor your email for a decision letter. However, today, it changed back to Awaiting Referee Scores. 20, awaiting reviewer scores, should be under review. " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? Will my paper be reviewed again? Hi. If that was the case for your paper, then a subsequent change to "Awaiting reviewer invitation" would mean that the editor is sending your paper for an additional review. The status is still "awaiting assignment" and I checked the online system which shows that even no editor has been assigned to my paper. I think it seems a long time for this step. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. In general, editors and journals may want more than you to have a quick decision back to you, as the journal indices can be affected, which in turn may affect authors selecting the journal, and, Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Indicates that invitations have already been sent to reviewers but that reviewers have not yet responded. 11 After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. " It has not yet changed to "under review" status. e. Papers that do not meet these criteria will be rejected. After a while, yesterday the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation". So, now it's in the normal process of the Editor assessing the reviews. Hello, I submitted my paper to one of the high impact factor journals month ago. Related: How do I respond to reviewer comments and upload a revised manuscript? We have submitted a revised manuscript. thanks a lot. 0. Ex. This change has occurred But, quickly after this, the status changed to “awaiting EIC decision” within 2 weeks and is stuck at that for 3 weeks. If the article is rejected or sent back for either major or minor revision, the handling editor should include constructive comments from the reviewers to help the author improve the article. In case if it gets rejected after 8-9 months, it will add up to the chaos of the author. Also, After more than a year of passing through review > major review > review > minor revision > review, the status has been ‘Awaiting EIC decision’ for the past 20 days. I thought I could expect to hear the Associated Editor's decision soon. Reviewer Support. Since the average time for the first decision is one month, you should be informed about the decision soon. This change has It means the Editor wants to assign your manuscript to a reviewer. Hello, for your information, I submitted my paper on the 28. There is no set time for this to take. Request Unregistered Reviewer: Opens an email form for you to enter details of reviewers, which you can then send to the Editorial Office to be registered. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. After one day the status was EA assignment pending and after two more days it was under review. Since it has been about a month since the status “Awaiting a reviewer reply” has been put up, the second option seems more likely. I have submitted the paper on 31st January 2021. (date). Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. The number of times your manuscript status has changed to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and then back to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ reflects the challenge the editor is having in getting the requisite number of The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. Their latest update, received on 14/11/2023, stated: "We are Hi, I've submitted my paper to IEEE transaction. -Awaiting EiC assignment-Awaiting Awaiting initial review by the Sage Path Office to ensure we have the correct information to process your manuscript. As per my understanding, the status should be Awaiting EIC Decision. My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review’ last three days ago. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. I don't know what this means and why it is taking so long. " It's a s**t show. ’ It is a little odd that the latter statuses are taking longer. Coming to your present query, as we just indicated, this has been a slow change from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘Under Review. 2022/10/13 submit, Awaiting AE Assignment 2022/10/17 Status: Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2022/11/4 Status: Under review 2023/2/12 Status: Major Revision 2023/3/27 Major revision submission, Status: Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 2023/3/19 Status: Under review 2023/5/26 Status: Accept The review process took a long time, a total of 225 days, but After a few days, the status changed to "Awaiting Review Scores". During reject and resubmit, I got So, while the final decision may take some time, you may have some reason to be hopeful. Now in February, 2022, I resumitted the manuscript. Still the status is same. This rather ambiguous stage is when reviewers have been invited, but we are move on to a stage such as “Awaiting Recommendation” and/or “Awaiting Decision” and it generally won’t be long before a decision is sent to you. As it has been only two weeks since you submitted your paper and only one week since the status changed to ‘Awaiting Editor Assignment,’ you may need to wait for some time, let’s say, two-three weeks, for the next status update. Does this indicate rejection? This article shows the editorial process after Submitting a manuscript to a journal. Just want to know what you think based on I submitted a manuscript to a journal, and the status changed from Awaiting Reviewer Selection to Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation. The assigned reviewer will review the manuscript and provide recommendations that would help the editor reach a decision on It typically means that the paper has been received, has been put in the work queue of the editor, but the editor has not assigned reviewers. If I withdraw my submission now, I'll forfeit all the time I've already invested in waiting. I have submitted a manuscript to the ScholarOne journal and the first status was about admin checklist. You could wait up to a month before thinking of sending a polite reminder. It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. Oct 2022, it passed all the steps of reviews. ' However, I'm The journal editor has possibly identified and sent out invitations to potential reviewers for your paper and is waiting for their response. Whether a long time at this status hints towards a negative outcome. It has been more than a month since then but the status has remained "Assigned to AE. Sometimes, the tracking system may show the “Reviewer Invited” status for some time and then move back to “With Editor. A month ago, I submitted my paper to the Emerald journal, which uses the ScholarOne manuscript system. The publishing time is too long, starting from 3 months. amnss wqhmfnc ysueo uohu pwtle yji ibznf lgrreuoc idjxo dcundp